LQ ISO Hits 1,000,000 Downloads

In just over a year, LQ ISO has facilitated over 1,000,000 Linux ISO downloads. We've added a couple interesting features, such as using GEO IP data to offer you the closest fast mirror (while retaining the freedom to pick any mirror you'd like), along the way. With over 175 distribution versions available from over 430 mirrors, hopefully the site has your favorite distro available for download. If not, please use the suggest link and we'll add it ASAP. Our end goal is to have every distro in distrowatch and then some.
–jeremy
, ,

Microsoft Leveraging iPod Patent?

Am I the only one who in no way understands all the recent hype over this patent issue (I'll keep my opinion of patents in general to myself for the moment, since I've made that quite known in the past). First, the Microsoft patent in no way overlaps with the iPod, from what I can tell. The patent is for AutoDJ, which “generates playlists for a library collection of media items via selecting a plurality of seed items, at least one which is an undesirable seed item.”, something I'm not aware the iPod is capable of. While it's true that Apple's patent application did get denied, I fail to see where that translates into Microsoft being able to charge money for the AutoDJ patent (which was indeed approved). To be honest, patents aside, the AutoDJ idea sounds cool. Where skynews got this $10/iPod figure from I have no idea, but I'd guess someone just made it up! Even if the Microsoft patent does somehow cover something that is in the iPod, wouldn't the fact that the patent was filed well after the iPod actually shipped mean prior art would be extremely easy to prove? Unreal – someone please clue me in here as I must be missing something.
–jeremy
, , , ,

Did Firefox Lose Market Share in July to IE?

Looks like NetApplications thinks so. A .64% drop, with a sample size of only 40,000 sites and not a single mention of expected error margin don't mean a whole lot to me though. I posted LQ's numbers a while back. If I have time later I'll re-run stats to see if the indicated trend is apparent on LQ. Speculating on why this happened would be tenuous at best at this point, but it could be anything from a sampling error to the fact that all the new “back to school” PC's come preloaded with IE. I've even heard rumors that some Microsoft patches have the side effect of re-enabling IE as the default browser. I'm going to wait until next month to see if this trend continues next month before I expend too much mental capacity on this one, but I have to admit that I've been wondering where Firefox's natural market share would stabilize at. No opinion from Asa on this yet.
–jeremy
, ,

Did Firefox Lose Market Share in July to IE Followup

As you could probably tell, I seemed a bit skeptical in this post. I decided to run some stats on LQ and compare them to the ones I did in July. It turns out that LQ has also seen a small drop in Mozilla/Firefox usage and a small increase in IE usage. I have to admit I'm quite surprised. I'm interested to do this same test again next month to see if a pattern is emerging. We all knew that the growth of Firefox had to slow down a bit at some point, but I thought that plateau would come after 10%. Let the speculation begin on why it's happening. I don't think the fact that all the new “back to school” PC's come preloaded with IE should be underestimated. Given a little time to become infested with Spyware, will the Firefox number start to rise again? Any other speculation? The numbers below are for the first two weeks of August (I've included the July numbers for comparison).

Browser %
Firefox/Mozilla 57.7 -> 56.8%
Explorer 27.9 -> 29.1%
Unknown 5.2 -> 5.2%
Konqueror 4.1 -> 3.9%
Opera 3.3 ->3.2%
Safari 1.2 -> 1.2%
Galeon 0.3 -> 0.3%
Links/Lynx 0.2 -> 0.2%

–jeremy
, ,

HP Calls For Sun and IBM to Remove OSS Licenses

You have to love it when one large company calls for two other competing companies to do something. In this case Martin Fink calls for Sun and IBM to depreciate the CDDL and CPL, respectively. First, having just attended the OSI BOF at OSCON, I am acutely aware of the problem with license proliferation. Beyond being aware of it, I agree that it really is a problem and have even offered LQ's help to the OSI in helping with the problem. That being said, this is just a pot shot and was clearly posturing. Considering one of the main mantra's of the OSS community is that choice is good, it seems odd to try and force everyone to use the GPL. The GPL is a good license for some cases, but it's not for everyone. It's not multiple licenses that are bad, it's the proliferation of needless licenses that is bad. Remember that for instance the CDDL is mostly Mozilla's MPL, with a few changes that Sun felt were necessary. In fact, the CDDL announcement clearly states:

We have carefully reviewed the existing OSI approved licenses and found none of them to meet our needs, and thus have reluctantly drafted a new open source license based on the Mozilla Public License, version 1.1 (“MPL”). We do appreciate the issue of license proliferation, however, and have worked hard to make the Common Development and Distribution License (“CDDL”) as reusable as possible. Additionally, we have attempted to address the problems we perceived in existing open source licenses that led us to conclude that reusing those existing licenses was impractical.

Also, I don't know if it was Martin or the journalist who said “In contrast, an open-source license, like IBM's, is copyrighted”. This insinuates that the GPL is not copyrighted, which is obviously incorrect. The bottom line is, use the right tool for the job and then license that tool under the right Open Source license. Yes, it's a shame that all code is not compatible. The driving reason behind why people open source code is different though. Don't forget that neither of the two products that are quickly becoming the backbone of the web, Firefox and Apache, are GPL'd. Perhaps the biggest irony here is that IBM and Sun have both done significantly more for the Open Source community than HP has (not to detract from the legitimate contributions HP has made, but let's get some perspective here). He did get the crowd to clap though, and to some I guess that's all that matter.
–jeremy
, , , , , , ,

OSCON and Gnomedex Reflection

It's clear having attended both OSCON and Gnomedex that the excitement is coming back to the web and Open Source communities. The good news is that the irrational exuberance of the bubble has been replaced with rational exuberance. People are excited again. And for good reason – exciting things are happening. Whether you like the Web 2.0 meme or not (Tim Bray doesn't, while Tim O'Reilly does), it's clear that things are changing. It's still not clear where all this will end up, but it's great being part of the ride. On the conference note, the first LinuxWorld without an LQ booth in a long time started today. It's a shame we couldn't be there and I'm going to miss the chance to meet so many members at once. I remain hopeful that we'll be at LWE Boston and LWE London though.
–jeremy
, , , ,

Home From OSCON

Well, OSCON is over and I'm back home now. For those of you who've never been to an OSCON, it's a really great conference. Well worth attending (and then some). I only attended half of the last day, due to my flight time, but still got to see Asa Dotzler, Nathan Torkington, Howtoons, Danny O'Brien On Evil and much more. As I mentioned a couple times, there really is just too much going on to blog it properly. You just don't want to miss anything. I look forward to attending and once again sponsoring OSCON 2006. Thanks for a great show.
–jeremy
, ,

OSCON OSI BOF

I attended the OSCON OSI BOF last night. Overall I think it went extremely well and was quite encouraging. So encouraging that I've offered to do whatever I can (if anything) to help. One of the main topics discussed was License Proliferation. While no one on the OSI board or in the crowd had any solid definitive answers, they are starting to fully understand the problem and attempt to formulate a plan. I for one am glad to see that they're not just jumping into anything, but are trying to learn from the past and make a sound decision here. It's certainly not going to be an easy problem to solve. They also discussed the possibility of opening up the OSI to some kind of membership. The crowd was really into this BOF, which was great to see. After the BOF was over, a Brazilian drink of some kind was being made. Unfortunately I wasn't around long enough after the meeting to try it. I ran into Steve Mallet at the meeting (he's the OSI webmaster) and we ended up discussing quite a bit of stuff from Sun to Linux on the Desktop. Was great to meet Steve in person as we've discussed quite a bit online in the past. He's agreed to be a future LQ Radio guest, so stay tuned for that.
, , ,

Dtrace OSCON session

I'm in a session on Dtrace, being given by Bryan Cantrill, who is one of the Dtrace authors. I have to say that Dtrace is really nice. Someone needs to implement this for Linux – it's really useful. DProbes was the closest thing I could find for Linux, and it's not even in the same ballpark. This tool really has the ability to save you tons of time when debugging system performance problems.
–jeremy
, , ,

OSCON Updates

Unfortunately, I haven't been able to post much from OSCON – the conference is really that good…and really that busy. The sessions have been extremely interesting, the speaking lineup outstanding and the number of people to meet impressive. I'll detail a few highlights here, but as I mentioned yesterday, I'm really not doing the conference justice.
Ilia gave a nice PHP session on speeding up PHP, which is something I put a great deal of time into for LQ. Most of what he went over (compiler flags, configure option, non-PIC library, etc) we already have implemented. It was kind of nice to see how much of what he said I had already dug up ;) That being said, he did reveal a couple tricks which I haven't tried out, and I'll be testing those when I get home. Rasmus also gave a PHP session, this one focused on PHP5, but also covered some other things. Yahoo! is still on 4.x for speed reasons, but PHP 5.1 should clear those up. It's likely I'll try to move to 5.1.x when we do the LQ code upgrades later this year. He also covered the different opcode caches. The bottom line was that if you want a free one that is compatible with PHP 5.1, APC is just about your only option. It's a shame Zend snapped up the MMCache author (for us at least, not for him) as that one was consistently the fastest in my experience.
Chris DiBona covered a bit about what Google was doing. He also give a few small insights into Google that you don't usually get. There was even a current picture of a Google data center, although the lights were off. The Summer of Code was a large focus of the session. One thing of interest was the Google tends to prefer the BSD license over any of the others, but in the end they usually let the engineer who wrote the code choose whatever OSI-approved license they prefer. Once again – Google gets it, from an employee perspective. Inevitably, someone brought up the Google Windows-only client app question. sound familiar? While I agree with much of his response, it seems the answer is not sufficient for some.
Other sessions I attended included talks from Tim O'Reilly, Andrew Morten, Jeremy Zawodny, Mitchell Baker, well – you get the idea…the lineup is stacked. Each one of these is worthy of at least a full blog post. Unfortunately, I'm out of time as another session is about to start. FWIW, the biggest surprise so far was Jonathan Schwartz. I was expecting a live version of his blog during his opening day interview. Hearing him speak live, I'm now not even convinced he writes that blog. He was rational, and even brought up some good points – something I rarely find in his blog posts. I have to wonder though… has he changed his tune, or did the fact that he was in front of an OpenSource-centric OSCON crowd temporarily change his view point? Only time will tell.
–jeremy
, , ,