<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCO Plans Rebound Thanks to $100M Lifeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2008/02/14/sco-plans-rebound-thanks-to-100m-lifeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2008/02/14/sco-plans-rebound-thanks-to-100m-lifeline/</link>
	<description>Open Source > Linux > LQ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:02:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: taupist</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2008/02/14/sco-plans-rebound-thanks-to-100m-lifeline/comment-page-1/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>taupist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2008/02/14/sco-plans-rebound-thanks-to-100m-lifeline/#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>&quot;There is a possible silver lining here though. If Novell does win its case against SCO, now there may actually be some assets for them to take.&quot;

C&#039;mon, be serious. Do you honestly think that they would leave themselves open like that? One article that I read seemed to suggest that part of the deal was that this Norris guy is going to be insured against liability.
The whole point to this exercise seems to be to do as much damage as possible without exposing any assets or liability. This is clearly a game of dirty pool. This guy doesn&#039;t care whether or not he is in the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is a possible silver lining here though. If Novell does win its case against SCO, now there may actually be some assets for them to take.&#8221;</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, be serious. Do you honestly think that they would leave themselves open like that? One article that I read seemed to suggest that part of the deal was that this Norris guy is going to be insured against liability.<br />
The whole point to this exercise seems to be to do as much damage as possible without exposing any assets or liability. This is clearly a game of dirty pool. This guy doesn&#8217;t care whether or not he is in the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
