<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft to Submit Shared Source Licenses to OSI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/07/29/microsoft-to-submit-shared-source-licenses-to-osi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/07/29/microsoft-to-submit-shared-source-licenses-to-osi/</link>
	<description>Open Source > Linux > LQ</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OSI Approves Microsoft License Submissions at Jeremy&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/07/29/microsoft-to-submit-shared-source-licenses-to-osi/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>OSI Approves Microsoft License Submissions at Jeremy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/07/29/microsoft-to-submit-shared-source-licenses-to-osi/#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>[...] few moths ago, Microsoft submitted the Microsoft Permissive License (Ms-PL) and the Microsoft Community License (Ms-CL) to the OSI for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few moths ago, Microsoft submitted the Microsoft Permissive License (Ms-PL) and the Microsoft Community License (Ms-CL) to the OSI for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSI email group gets catty over Microsoft&#8217;s Permissive License request at Jeremy&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/07/29/microsoft-to-submit-shared-source-licenses-to-osi/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>OSI email group gets catty over Microsoft&#8217;s Permissive License request at Jeremy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/07/29/microsoft-to-submit-shared-source-licenses-to-osi/#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>[...] what should come as no surprise, it looks like the discussion surrounding the Microsoft OSI submissions are getting a little cantankerous. From the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what should come as no surprise, it looks like the discussion surrounding the Microsoft OSI submissions are getting a little cantankerous. From the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More OSCON licening announcements at Jeremy&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/07/29/microsoft-to-submit-shared-source-licenses-to-osi/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>More OSCON licening announcements at Jeremy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/07/29/microsoft-to-submit-shared-source-licenses-to-osi/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>[...] Archives         &#171; Microsoft to Submit Shared Source Licenses to OSI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Archives         &laquo; Microsoft to Submit Shared Source Licenses to OSI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
