<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you can&#39;t beat them, fine them (The EU&#39;s wrong policy on Microsoft)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/03/08/if-you-cant-beat-them-fine-them-the-eus-wrong-policy-on-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/03/08/if-you-cant-beat-them-fine-them-the-eus-wrong-policy-on-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Open Source > Linux > LQ</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/03/08/if-you-cant-beat-them-fine-them-the-eus-wrong-policy-on-microsoft/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/03/08/if-you-cant-beat-them-fine-them-the-eus-wrong-policy-on-microsoft/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>I don&#39;t like software patents either.  This isn&#39;t really about software patents though.  I do agree with the EU ruling that ordered Microsoft to disclose its protocols to rivals.  They were abusing a monopoly position.  It just makes me nervous to have Government decide what innovation is and how much it&#39;s worth.
--jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t like software patents either.  This isn&#39;t really about software patents though.  I do agree with the EU ruling that ordered Microsoft to disclose its protocols to rivals.  They were abusing a monopoly position.  It just makes me nervous to have Government decide what innovation is and how much it&#39;s worth.<br />
&#8211;jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/03/08/if-you-cant-beat-them-fine-them-the-eus-wrong-policy-on-microsoft/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 07:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/03/08/if-you-cant-beat-them-fine-them-the-eus-wrong-policy-on-microsoft/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>&gt; I don&#39;t think anyone, [..] want courts and judges deciding
&gt; what is "significant innovation"
this might be true in a world without software patents, but in this world we have patents granted for "significant innovation" (by "judges") and those hurt a lot...
I don&#39;t like software patents. There should (must!) be a way to "cancel" them if they where granted inadequately. But what to do if this happens "outside"? Could the EU commision challenge a patent in the US? I think not. They do "regulations" with fines.
This decision can and will be appealed against, so you are right we will see what will happen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> I don&#39;t think anyone, [..] want courts and judges deciding<br />
> what is &#8220;significant innovation&#8221;<br />
this might be true in a world without software patents, but in this world we have patents granted for &#8220;significant innovation&#8221; (by &#8220;judges&#8221;) and those hurt a lot&#8230;<br />
I don&#39;t like software patents. There should (must!) be a way to &#8220;cancel&#8221; them if they where granted inadequately. But what to do if this happens &#8220;outside&#8221;? Could the EU commision challenge a patent in the US? I think not. They do &#8220;regulations&#8221; with fines.<br />
This decision can and will be appealed against, so you are right we will see what will happen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
