http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/01/22/the-meaning-of-free/ Open Source > Linux > LQ Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:02:52 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/01/22/the-meaning-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-316 Anonymous Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:14:13 +0000 http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/01/22/the-meaning-of-free/#comment-316 Not sure it's necessary, but it will be interesting to watch and see if anything comes out of it in the end. --jeremy Not sure it's necessary, but it will be interesting to watch and see if anything comes out of it in the end.
–jeremy

]]> http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/01/22/the-meaning-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-315 Anonymous Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:47:13 +0000 http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2007/01/22/the-meaning-of-free/#comment-315 To add an additional ray of light to your closing comment, I just read in the Linspire Letter, that CnR will be opened and made available to other distros, with hooks to the existing package managers. If this is technically achievable then this is another valuable contribution to the Linux world. This development will make possible an easy graphical, one step package manager for whatever distro you use, which a lot of people want and need (not me, but you know...). Do you think that this spatting is necessary to move each respective point of view forward? To add an additional ray of light to your closing comment, I just read in the Linspire Letter, that CnR will be opened and made available to other distros, with hooks to the existing package managers. If this is technically achievable then this is another valuable contribution to the Linux world. This development will make possible an easy graphical, one step package manager for whatever distro you use, which a lot of people want and need (not me, but you know…).
Do you think that this spatting is necessary to move each respective point of view forward?

]]>