<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Discussion Draft of GPLv3 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/30/second-discussion-draft-of-gplv3-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/30/second-discussion-draft-of-gplv3-released/</link>
	<description>Open Source > Linux > LQ</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/30/second-discussion-draft-of-gplv3-released/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2006/07/30/second-discussion-draft-of-gplv3-released/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>I agree with GPLv3.  Having access to the source and not being able to modify and run your modified version is putting a big restriction on open sourceness of that code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with GPLv3.  Having access to the source and not being able to modify and run your modified version is putting a big restriction on open sourceness of that code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
