http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/11/08/microsoft-open-source-not-that-open/ Open Source > Linux > LQ Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:02:52 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/11/08/microsoft-open-source-not-that-open/comment-page-1/#comment-199 Anonymous Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:43:00 +0000 http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/11/08/microsoft-open-source-not-that-open/#comment-199 I like the arguements you make for Open Source Jeremy. They are to the point and often the simplist arguement you can make but it is easy to loose track of the reasons why Open Source is so good when you have FUD such as "As open source becomes commercialized, it becomes less open" being made. It is such a badly thought idea, one that is looking from one side of the fence and completely wrong! Shows a fundatmental lack of understanding of what Open Source is. I like the arguements you make for Open Source Jeremy. They are to the point and often the simplist arguement you can make but it is easy to loose track of the reasons why Open Source is so good when you have FUD such as “As open source becomes commercialized, it becomes less open” being made. It is such a badly thought idea, one that is looking from one side of the fence and completely wrong! Shows a fundatmental lack of understanding of what Open Source is.

]]>