<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Leveraging iPod Patent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/08/16/microsoft-leveraging-ipod-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/08/16/microsoft-leveraging-ipod-patent/</link>
	<description>Open Source > Linux > LQ</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/08/16/microsoft-leveraging-ipod-patent/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2005 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/08/16/microsoft-leveraging-ipod-patent/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>You must be forgetting about a small Utah company that tried this type of thing to remain solvent as well.
I agree with you that its a neat idea.  Perhaps Microsoft would be better off if they put their efforts and funds into their own ideas instead of trying to bully some funds for others&#39; ideas.  Maybe they will change their ways, but it doesn&#39;t look like it.
I just read something about this in "Michael&#39;s Minutes".  I don&#39;t know how others think about Mr Robertson&#39;s ideas, but I think that he may have a point when it comes to Microsoft&#39;s requirement to dominate the playing field, regardless of how productive that may be.  He has had quite a lengthy adversarial relationship with the Redmond Giant.  Who knows?
BTW, you&#39;re not the only one who doesn&#39;t understand this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be forgetting about a small Utah company that tried this type of thing to remain solvent as well.<br />
I agree with you that its a neat idea.  Perhaps Microsoft would be better off if they put their efforts and funds into their own ideas instead of trying to bully some funds for others&#39; ideas.  Maybe they will change their ways, but it doesn&#39;t look like it.<br />
I just read something about this in &#8220;Michael&#39;s Minutes&#8221;.  I don&#39;t know how others think about Mr Robertson&#39;s ideas, but I think that he may have a point when it comes to Microsoft&#39;s requirement to dominate the playing field, regardless of how productive that may be.  He has had quite a lengthy adversarial relationship with the Redmond Giant.  Who knows?<br />
BTW, you&#39;re not the only one who doesn&#39;t understand this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
