<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OS X and the x86 Whitebox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/07/26/os-x-and-the-x86-whitebox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/07/26/os-x-and-the-x86-whitebox/</link>
	<description>Open Source > Linux > LQ</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/07/26/os-x-and-the-x86-whitebox/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/07/26/os-x-and-the-x86-whitebox/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>hey tried licensing to OEM&#39;s years ago.  Umax was eating their lunch because they made a shaky Apple clone at a low price.
Wisely, (I think) they pulled the plug on that idea.  
I&#39;d go a slightly different direction and license their server product on generic x86 server hardware sans their desktop.  (use KDE/Gnome/whatever) 
Good, high-margin revenue and BSD security.  I don&#39;t know why they wouldn&#39;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey tried licensing to OEM&#39;s years ago.  Umax was eating their lunch because they made a shaky Apple clone at a low price.<br />
Wisely, (I think) they pulled the plug on that idea.<br />
I&#39;d go a slightly different direction and license their server product on generic x86 server hardware sans their desktop.  (use KDE/Gnome/whatever)<br />
Good, high-margin revenue and BSD security.  I don&#39;t know why they wouldn&#39;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
