<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Funded Benchmark - Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/08/microsoft-funded-benchmark-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/08/microsoft-funded-benchmark-again/</link>
	<description>Open Source > Linux > LQ</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/08/microsoft-funded-benchmark-again/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/08/microsoft-funded-benchmark-again/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing this out Marty.  My response is here: http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/blog/_archives/2005/5/14/857080.html
--jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing this out Marty.  My response is here: <a href="http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/blog/_archives/2005/5/14/857080.html" rel="nofollow">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/blog/_archives/2005/5/14/857080.html</a><br />
&#8211;jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/08/microsoft-funded-benchmark-again/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.linuxquestions.org/2005/05/08/microsoft-funded-benchmark-again/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Ahhh. Another blivet from Veritest. Only a marketing department can love those.
Two quickies. First, RedHat was quick to confirm that they intend to continue to support both OpenLDAP and the Netscape code .. see the article at http://news.com.com/Red+Hat+acquires+AOLs+Netscape+server+software/2100-7344_3-5388906.html. 
Second: is it fair to compare a unicycle to an SUV? Active Directory is only good for running Windows Domains (the unicycle) and, oh by the way, supports contact books. OpenLDAP and the other LDAP products are full function directories that CAN do everything Active Directory does and much more. Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh. Another blivet from Veritest. Only a marketing department can love those.<br />
Two quickies. First, RedHat was quick to confirm that they intend to continue to support both OpenLDAP and the Netscape code .. see the article at <a href="http://news.com.com/Red+Hat+acquires+AOLs+Netscape+server+software/2100-7344_3-5388906.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/Red+Hat+acquires+AOLs+Netscape+server+software/2100-7344_3-5388906.html</a>.<br />
Second: is it fair to compare a unicycle to an SUV? Active Directory is only good for running Windows Domains (the unicycle) and, oh by the way, supports contact books. OpenLDAP and the other LDAP products are full function directories that CAN do everything Active Directory does and much more. Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
